Comments on: Non-Shared Temp Tables Cleanup

By: Iouri Chadour

Iouri Chadour — Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:32:28 +0000

This actually may be a great idea – can’t see any downsides to this one – thank you

By: Iouri Chadour

Iouri Chadour — Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:30:36 +0000

as processes execute a they will populate this table with tables that they are currently using, in case you execute a generic SQL like you mentioned this may unlock some of those table for use and cause trouble in case some other contending process may try and use them

By: Trybik

Trybik — Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:22:50 +0000

Or, if you are afraid of currently running processes, you could use something like this:

UPDATE PS_TEMP_TBL_ASGNM SET
in_use_sw=’N',
process_instance=0
WHERE process_instance IN
(
SELECT prcsinstance FROM psprcsrqst
WHERE runstatus NOT IN (5, 7)
);

— is there anything wrong with this approach?

By: Trybik

Trybik — Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:21:18 +0000

Why not just running a more general:

update PS_TEMP_TBL_ASGNM set
in_use_sw=’N',
process_instance=0